DevOpsil
Load Balancing

HAProxy vs Nginx

Compare the two most battle-tested reverse proxies and load balancers — HAProxy for pure TCP/HTTP load balancing and Nginx for web serving plus proxying.

HAProxyNginx
CriteriaHAProxyNginx
Primary StrengthPurpose-built load balancer and proxy. Excels at high-connection TCP/HTTP traffic. Used by GitHub, Stack Overflow, and Reddit.Web server first, reverse proxy second. Serves static files, proxies, and load balances. Used by 34% of all websites.
PerformanceMulti-threaded event-driven. Best-in-class for connection handling and latency. Can handle millions of concurrent connections.Event-driven, non-blocking I/O. Excellent performance but HAProxy typically wins in pure proxy benchmarks.
Health CheckingAdvanced health checks — TCP, HTTP, agent-check, external scripts. Granular server state management with drain and maintenance modes.Basic health checks in open-source. Advanced health checks require Nginx Plus (commercial). Less granular by default.
ConfigurationSingle config file with frontend/backend model. Stats page built-in. Runtime API for live changes. Steep learning curve.Familiar server/location block model. Extensive documentation. Dynamic modules. Easier for web developers to learn.
SSL/TLSFull SSL/TLS termination and passthrough. SNI-based routing. OCSP stapling. Certificate hot-reload via runtime API.Full SSL/TLS support. Let's Encrypt integration. HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 (QUIC) support. Widely documented configurations.
Rate LimitingStick tables for rate limiting, connection tracking, and abuse prevention. Highly flexible with ACL-based rules.limit_req and limit_conn modules. Zone-based rate limiting. Simpler but less flexible than HAProxy stick tables.

Verdict

Choose HAProxy for dedicated load balancing with advanced health checks and TCP proxy needs. Choose Nginx when you also need to serve static content, run as a web server, or want simpler configuration.